26 research outputs found

    Youth-Led Community Building: Promising Practices from Two Communities Using Community-Based Service-Learning

    Get PDF
    Little research exists about how youth voice and engagement in community building can be successfully implemented. This article discusses promising practices from an evaluation study of community-based service-learning, sponsored by 4-H/Youth Development. The practices are those that the programs used to promote youth and engagement and voice while also providing service in the form of community building to the communities. The data indicate that youth can lead community building. Implications for Extension include offering guidance on youth-led, asset-based community building, offering an additional model of service-learning, and offering a broad framework for documentation and evaluation to help explain such work

    The Power of Convening: Building a Learning Community and Fostering a Network in the Building Bridges Initiative

    Get PDF
    This report from the Philanthropy and Volunteerism team discusses some important lessons about convening that were learned from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Building Bridges Initiative. It explores the roots of the Building Bridges Initiative, including the concepts and purposes that guided its development, and gives an overview of the work -- its scope and infrastructure. Additionally, the report describes the transformation of the initiative's networking meetings into Learning Community Meetings

    Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: Policy priorities and research directions

    Get PDF
    For more than a decade, many researchers and practitioners have endorsed a “positive youth development” approach, which views adolescents as active contributors to their own development and as assets to their communities. As part of this shift, youth are increasingly being invited to engage in community governance. In youth organizations, schools, community organizations, and public policy arenas, youth are making strong contributions to advisory boards and planning councils, and are integrally involved in key day-to-day functions such as program design, budgeting, outreach, public relations, training, and evaluation. State and local policy-makers are also beginning to endorse the engagement of youth in community governance. This policy endorsement, however, has largely occurred independent of scholarship on adolescent development. In this Social Policy Report, our aim is to help bridge this gap. We discuss the cultural context for youth engagement, theoretical rationales and innovative models, empirical evidence, and priorities for policy and research. Why involve youth in community governance? Three main theoretical rationales have been established: Ensuring social justice and youth representation, building civil society, and promoting youth development. Moreover, across the country, innovative models demonstrate that the theory can be effectively translated into policy. Finally, a strong research base supports the practice. When youth are engaged in meaningful decision-making – in families, schools, and youth organizations – research finds clear and consistent developmental benefits for the young people. An emerging body of research shows that organizations and communities also derive benefits when youth are engaged in governance. Several directions need to be pursued for youth engagement to exert a maximum positive impact on young people and their communities. We recommend three areas for policy development. First, public awareness of the practice needs to be better established. Societal expectations for youth remain low and negative stereotypes remain entrenched in the mass media. Second, more stable funding is needed for youth engagement. It will be especially critical to support community-based youth organizations because these places are likely to remain the primary catalysts for youth engagement in the civic life of communities. Third, it is necessary to build local capacity by supporting outreach and training through cross-sector community coalitions and independent, nonprofit intermediary organizations. These entities are best positioned to convince stakeholder groups to chart, implement, and sustain youth engagement. It is equally important to broaden the scientific context for youth engagement in community governance. Priorities for scholars are to focus research on understanding: the organizational and community outcomes that emanate from engaging youth in governance; the competencies that youth bring to governance; and how the practice of youth engagement can be sustained by communities

    Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: Policy priorities and research directions

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT: For more than a decade, many researchers and practitioners have endorsed a “positive youth development” approach, which views adolescents as active contributors to their own development and as assets to their communities. As part of this shift, youth are increasingly being invited to engage in community governance. In youth organizations, schools, community organizations, and public policy arenas, youth are making strong contributions to advisory boards and planning councils, and are integrally involved in key day-to-day functions such as program design, budgeting, outreach, public relations, training, and evaluation. State and local policy-makers are also beginning to endorse the engagement of youth in community governance. This policy endorsement, however, has largely occurred independent of scholarship on adolescent development. In this Social Policy Report, our aim is to help bridge this gap. We discuss the cultural context for youth engagement, theoretical rationales and innovative models, empirical evidence, and priorities for policy and research. Why involve youth in community governance? Three main theoretical rationales have been established: Ensuring social justice and youth representation, building civil society, and promoting youth development. Moreover, across the country, innovative models demonstrate that the theory can be effectively translated into policy. Finally, a strong research base supports the practice. When youth are engaged in meaningful decision-making – in families, schools, and youth organizations – research finds clear and consistent developmental benefits for the young people. An emerging body of research shows that organizations and communities also derive benefits when youth are engaged in governance. Several directions need to be pursued for youth engagement to exert a maximum positive impact on young people and their communities. We recommend three 91 areas for policy development. First, public awareness of the practice needs to be better established. Societal expectations for youth remain low and negative stereotypes remain entrenched in the mass media. Second, more stable funding is needed for youth engagement. It will be especially critical to support community-based youth organizations because these places are likely to remain the primary catalysts for youth engagement in the civic life of communities. Third, it is necessary to build local capacity by supporting outreach and training through cross-sector community coalitions and independent, nonprofit intermediary organizations. These entities are best positioned to convince stakeholder groups to chart, implement, and sustain youth engagement. It is equally important to broaden the scientific context for youth engagement in community governance. Priorities for scholars are to focus research on understanding: the organizational and community outcomes that emanate from engaging youth in governance; the competencies that youth bring to governance; and how the practice of youth engagement can be sustained by communitiesRESUMO: Há mais de 10 anos que vários investigadores e interventores têm vindo a defender os resultados positivos de abordagens que promovem o envolvimento dos jovens, esta perspectiva vê os adolescentes como facilitadores activos do seu próprio desenvolvimento e como recursos importantes para as suas comunidades. Como parte destas mudanças os jovens têm vindo a ser cada vez mais envolvidos na governança das suas comunidades. Os jovens têm vindo a dar contributos importantes nas organizações juvenis, nas escolas, nas organizações comunitárias e na definição de políticas públicas, através da sua participação em conselhos consultivos e equipas de planeamento de intervenção e estão plenamente envolvidos nas funções/actividades inerentes ao desenvolvimento destas acções, como o desenvolvimento de designs de intervenção, orçamentos, relações públicas, formação e avaliação. Os decisores políticos de nível local e estatal começam agora a valorizar o envolvimento dos jovens na governança das comunidades. Esta política de envolvimento dos jovens, contudo, tem ocorrido de forma independente do investimento no desenvolvimento dos adolescentes. Neste Social Policy Report, o objectivo é preencher a lacuna entre estas duas áreas. Discutimos o contexto cultural do envolvimento dos jovens, teorias e modelos inovadores, evidências empíricas e prioridades para a intervenção e pesquisa. Porque envolver os jovens na governança das comunidades? Têm sido identificadas três fundamentações teóricas de base: Assegurara a justiça social e a representação dos jovens; construir uma sociedade civil e promover o desenvolvimento dos jovens. Contudo, de uma forma geral, modelos inovadores têm vindo a demonstrar que a teoria pode ser eficazmente transformada em política. Por outro lado, uma forte pesquisa de base serve de suporte à prática. Quando os jovens estão envolvidos em processos de tomadas de decisão importantes – nas famílias, nas escolas, e nas organizações juvenis – a pesquisa identifica evidências claras e consistentes dos benefícios para o desenvolvimento desses jovens. Um conjunto de pesquisas recentes mostram-nos, também, que organizações e comunidades retiram benefícios da participação dos jovens na sua governança. Várias acções devem ser desenvolvidas para que se retire o máximo proveito do envolvimento dos jovens para os próprios e para as comunidades. Recomendamos três áreas para o desenvolvimento dessas políticas. Primeiro, o reconhecimento público do sucesso destas práticas necessita de ser melhor divulgado. As expectativas sociais sobre os jovens continuam baixas e os estereótipos negativos continuam a ser veiculados pelos média. Segundo, são necessários apoios económicos mais estáveis para o envolvimento dos jovens. Especialmente no caso das associações juvenis que nascem nas comunidades, pois estas continuam a ser o principal catalizador para a participação dos jovens na vida cívica das comunidades. Terceiro, é necessário promover o desenvolvimento de competências locais dando suporte ao nível da formação, nos vários sectores das organizações comunitárias, coligações e associações sem fins lucraticos. Estas entidades estão melhor posicionadas para convencerem os grupos com poder de decisão no sentido de planearem, implementarem e manterem o envolvimento dos jovens. É igualmente importante expandir o contexto científico para o envolvimento dos jovens na governança comunitária. As prioridades dos académicos deverão ser a focalização da pesquisa na compreensão: dos resultados do envolvimento dos jovens na governança, quer ao nível organizacional, quer ao nível comunitário; as competências que os jovens transportam para a governança; e como é que a prática do envolvimento dos jovens pode ser sustentada/mantida pelas comunidades.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    State of the climate in 2018

    Get PDF
    In 2018, the dominant greenhouse gases released into Earth’s atmosphere—carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide—continued their increase. The annual global average carbon dioxide concentration at Earth’s surface was 407.4 ± 0.1 ppm, the highest in the modern instrumental record and in ice core records dating back 800 000 years. Combined, greenhouse gases and several halogenated gases contribute just over 3 W m−2 to radiative forcing and represent a nearly 43% increase since 1990. Carbon dioxide is responsible for about 65% of this radiative forcing. With a weak La Niña in early 2018 transitioning to a weak El Niño by the year’s end, the global surface (land and ocean) temperature was the fourth highest on record, with only 2015 through 2017 being warmer. Several European countries reported record high annual temperatures. There were also more high, and fewer low, temperature extremes than in nearly all of the 68-year extremes record. Madagascar recorded a record daily temperature of 40.5°C in Morondava in March, while South Korea set its record high of 41.0°C in August in Hongcheon. Nawabshah, Pakistan, recorded its highest temperature of 50.2°C, which may be a new daily world record for April. Globally, the annual lower troposphere temperature was third to seventh highest, depending on the dataset analyzed. The lower stratospheric temperature was approximately fifth lowest. The 2018 Arctic land surface temperature was 1.2°C above the 1981–2010 average, tying for third highest in the 118-year record, following 2016 and 2017. June’s Arctic snow cover extent was almost half of what it was 35 years ago. Across Greenland, however, regional summer temperatures were generally below or near average. Additionally, a satellite survey of 47 glaciers in Greenland indicated a net increase in area for the first time since records began in 1999. Increasing permafrost temperatures were reported at most observation sites in the Arctic, with the overall increase of 0.1°–0.2°C between 2017 and 2018 being comparable to the highest rate of warming ever observed in the region. On 17 March, Arctic sea ice extent marked the second smallest annual maximum in the 38-year record, larger than only 2017. The minimum extent in 2018 was reached on 19 September and again on 23 September, tying 2008 and 2010 for the sixth lowest extent on record. The 23 September date tied 1997 as the latest sea ice minimum date on record. First-year ice now dominates the ice cover, comprising 77% of the March 2018 ice pack compared to 55% during the 1980s. Because thinner, younger ice is more vulnerable to melting out in summer, this shift in sea ice age has contributed to the decreasing trend in minimum ice extent. Regionally, Bering Sea ice extent was at record lows for almost the entire 2017/18 ice season. For the Antarctic continent as a whole, 2018 was warmer than average. On the highest points of the Antarctic Plateau, the automatic weather station Relay (74°S) broke or tied six monthly temperature records throughout the year, with August breaking its record by nearly 8°C. However, cool conditions in the western Bellingshausen Sea and Amundsen Sea sector contributed to a low melt season overall for 2017/18. High SSTs contributed to low summer sea ice extent in the Ross and Weddell Seas in 2018, underpinning the second lowest Antarctic summer minimum sea ice extent on record. Despite conducive conditions for its formation, the ozone hole at its maximum extent in September was near the 2000–18 mean, likely due to an ongoing slow decline in stratospheric chlorine monoxide concentration. Across the oceans, globally averaged SST decreased slightly since the record El Niño year of 2016 but was still far above the climatological mean. On average, SST is increasing at a rate of 0.10° ± 0.01°C decade−1 since 1950. The warming appeared largest in the tropical Indian Ocean and smallest in the North Pacific. The deeper ocean continues to warm year after year. For the seventh consecutive year, global annual mean sea level became the highest in the 26-year record, rising to 81 mm above the 1993 average. As anticipated in a warming climate, the hydrological cycle over the ocean is accelerating: dry regions are becoming drier and wet regions rainier. Closer to the equator, 95 named tropical storms were observed during 2018, well above the 1981–2010 average of 82. Eleven tropical cyclones reached Saffir–Simpson scale Category 5 intensity. North Atlantic Major Hurricane Michael’s landfall intensity of 140 kt was the fourth strongest for any continental U.S. hurricane landfall in the 168-year record. Michael caused more than 30 fatalities and 25billion(U.S.dollars)indamages.InthewesternNorthPacific,SuperTyphoonMangkhutledto160fatalitiesand25 billion (U.S. dollars) in damages. In the western North Pacific, Super Typhoon Mangkhut led to 160 fatalities and 6 billion (U.S. dollars) in damages across the Philippines, Hong Kong, Macau, mainland China, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Tropical Storm Son-Tinh was responsible for 170 fatalities in Vietnam and Laos. Nearly all the islands of Micronesia experienced at least moderate impacts from various tropical cyclones. Across land, many areas around the globe received copious precipitation, notable at different time scales. Rodrigues and Réunion Island near southern Africa each reported their third wettest year on record. In Hawaii, 1262 mm precipitation at Waipā Gardens (Kauai) on 14–15 April set a new U.S. record for 24-h precipitation. In Brazil, the city of Belo Horizonte received nearly 75 mm of rain in just 20 minutes, nearly half its monthly average. Globally, fire activity during 2018 was the lowest since the start of the record in 1997, with a combined burned area of about 500 million hectares. This reinforced the long-term downward trend in fire emissions driven by changes in land use in frequently burning savannas. However, wildfires burned 3.5 million hectares across the United States, well above the 2000–10 average of 2.7 million hectares. Combined, U.S. wildfire damages for the 2017 and 2018 wildfire seasons exceeded $40 billion (U.S. dollars)

    Strengthening communities through youth participation

    Full text link
    In its work with community collaborations, the ACT for Youth initiative elevated youth engagement as one of its core outcomes and primary strategies. In this study by the Center for Nonprofits at University of Wisconsin - Madison, the authors explore how the ACT for Youth communities responded to the challenges of youth engagement

    'Nerves': Folk idiom for anxiety and depression?

    No full text
    This study suggests that 'nerves' as presented in a primary care clinic is a lay idiom for emotional distress and documents a relationship between the folk ailment 'nerves' and anxiety and depression. One hundred and forty-nine patients at a Virginia clinic were studied, 47 with 'nerves', and 102 controls. Testing with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) showed 'nerves' patients to be more anxious and depressed than controls. 'Nerves' patients had a mean GHQ score of 13.0 compared to 5.8 for controls (Pnerves anxiety and depression ethnomedicine popular healers culturally-appropriate primary health care

    First Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Digital Endpoint in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Impact for Patients and for Drug Development in Neuromuscular Diseases.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Functional outcome measures used to assess efficacy in clinical trials of investigational treatments for rare neuromuscular diseases like Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are performance-based tasks completed by the patient during hospital visits. These are prone to bias and may not reflect motor abilities in real-world settings. Digital tools, such as wearable devices and other remote sensors, provide the opportunity for continuous, objective, and sensitive measurements of functional ability during daily life. Maintaining ambulation is of key importance to individuals with DMD. Stride velocity 95th centile (SV95C) is the first wearable acquired digital endpoint to receive qualification from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to quantify the ambulation ability of ambulant DMD patients aged ≥5 years in drug therapeutic studies; it is also currently under review for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) qualification. SUMMARY: Focusing on SV95C as a key example, we describe perspectives of multiple stakeholders on the promise of novel digital endpoints in neuromuscular disease drug development
    corecore